[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150601202740.GA6716@amd>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 22:27:40 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
pali.rohar@...il.com, sre@...ian.org, sre@...g0.de,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com, khilman@...nel.org,
aaro.koskinen@....fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com,
patrikbachan@...il.com
Subject: Re: Please revert 3eea8b5d68c801fec788b411582b803463834752 as it
breaks touchscreen on n900.
On Mon 2015-06-01 10:47:30, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 05:21:11PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > > > The 3eea8b5d68c801fec788b411582b803463834752 is just bad.
> > > > >
> > > > > You were very welcome to review this patch at the time and/or suggest
> > > > > a fix that pleases everyone.
> > > >
> > > > You should be the one that should suggest fixes, as you broke it in
> > > > the first place. But clearly you don't understand that.
> > >
> > > You actually never asked for a fix, and went head first calling this
> > > patch "bad" and asking for nothing but reverting it.
> >
> > Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 21:08:16 +0200
> > Subject: 4.1 touchscreen regression on n900 -- pinpointed [was Re:
> > linux-n900
> > ...
> > Maxime, can you suggest a fix?
>
> How about we do something like below (it needs a small edt-ft5x06 fixup
> that I'll send separately). Not tested.
+ data_present = touchscreen_get_prop_u32(np,
"touchscreen-size-x",
+
input_abs_get_maximum(axis),
+ &maximum) |
+ touchscreen_get_prop_u32(np,
"touchscreen-fuzz-x",
+
input_abs_get_fuzz(axis),
+ &fuzz);
+ if (data_present)
+ touchscreen_set_params(dev, axis, maximum, fuzz);
Umm. So you are changing behaviour from "whatever was there" to
"input_abs_get_maximum"... in n900 case. Is that a good idea for a
regression fix this late in release cycle?
Maxime's patch should be easy to fix...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists