[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <556CF06F.7040402@broadcom.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:53:19 -0700
From: Arun Parameswaran <aparames@...adcom.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <ben@...adent.org.uk>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, <rjui@...adcom.com>,
<sbranden@...adcom.com>, <jdzheng@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: core: 'ethtool' issue with querying phy settings
On 15-06-01 02:46 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Arun Parameswaran <aparames@...adcom.com>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 14:41:43 -0700
>
>> It would be nice for the 'ethtool' to be flexible to support querying
>> specific PHY irrespective of the net implementation, but that is being
>> discussed in the other thread.
>
> Please stop arguing about this, it isn't valid.
>
> Your device is a switch, and therefore needs to be represented properly
> with the proper number of net_device objects.
>
> Even more importantly, the ethtool API is established and you cannot
> change these semantics without potentially breaking lots of applications
> and libraries out there.
>
> Your change is reverted, and I will absolutely not entertain any
> attempt to again change the semantics of this ethtool operation.
>
> Thanks.
>
I apologize if the patch broke any conventions, it was not my intend. I
understand the implications on other programs that use the interface.
Just so that I don’t make this mistake in the future and to understand this
better, does this mean that the 'phyad' parameter specified in the
'ethtool' command line is ignored ?
Thanks
Arun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists