[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <556D492C.1050403@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 11:41:56 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: ganguly.s@...sung.com
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
SUNEEL KUMAR SURIMANI <suneel@...sung.com>,
"vikram.m@...sung.com" <vikram.m@...sung.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Waiman.Long@...com" <Waiman.Long@...com>,
"oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
SHARAN ALLUR <sharan.allur@...sung.com>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] arm: Add for atomic half word exchange
On 06/02/2015 11:19 AM, Sarbojit Ganguly wrote:
> I made the CONFIG_ARCH_MULTI_V6=y and
> CONFIG_CPU_V6K=y
> CONFIG_CPU_32v6=y
> CONFIG_CPU_32v6K=y
>
> and compiled 4.0.4 with the patch. Result is a compilation success.
>
> Regards,
> Sarbojit
>
Hi Sarbojit,
I am not familiar about the implication of setting those options
unconditionally, But from Kconfig point of view
Arnd was expecting something like below IIUC
with the patch: (a quick example)
---8<---
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 9f1f09a..194fc13 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -812,6 +812,8 @@ config ARCH_MULTI_V6
bool "ARMv6 based platforms (ARM11)"
select ARCH_MULTI_V6_V7
select CPU_V6K
+ select CPU_32v6
+ select CPU_32v6k
config ARCH_MULTI_V7
bool "ARMv7 based platforms (Cortex-A, PJ4, Scorpion, Krait)"
> ------- Original Message -------
> Sender : Arnd Bergmann<arnd@...db.de>
> Date : May 19, 2015 18:51 (GMT+09:00)
> Title : Re: [RFC] arm: Add for atomic half word exchange
>
> On Tuesday 19 May 2015 09:39:33 Sarbojit Ganguly wrote:
>> Since 16 bit half word exchange was not there and MCS based qspinlock by Waiman's xchg_tail() requires an atomic exchange on a half word,
>> here is a small modification to __xchg() code.
>
> We have discussed a similar patch before, see
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/25/390
>
>> #if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6
>> @@ -50,6 +52,23 @@
>> : "r" (x), "r" (ptr)
>> : "memory", "cc");
>> break;
>> + /*
>> + * halfword exclusive exchange
>> + * This is new implementation as qspinlock
>> + * wants 16 bit atomic CAS.
>> + */
>> + case 2:
>> + asm volatile("@ __xchg2\n"
>> + "1: ldrexh %0, [%3]\n"
>> + " strexh %1, %2, [%3]\n"
>> + " teq %1, #0\n"
>> + " bne 1b"
>> + : "=&r" (ret), "=&r" (tmp)
>> + : "r" (x), "r" (ptr)
>> + : "memory", "cc");
>> + break;
>> case 4:
>> asm volatile("@ __xchg4\n"
>> "1: ldrex %0, [%3]\n"
>
> Please try to find a way to make this compile when CONFIG_CPU_V6
> is set.
>
> Arnd
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists