linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix a race between /proc/lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:30:43 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix a race between /proc/lock_stat and module unloading

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 02:47:15PM +0200, Jerome Marchand wrote:
> When opening /proc/lock_stat, lock_stat_open() makes a copy of
> all_lock_classes list in the form of an array of ad hoc structures
> lock_stat_data that reference lock_class, so it can be sorted and
> passed to seq_read(). However, nothing prevents module unloading code
> to free some of these lock_class structures before seq_read() tries to
> access them.

Well, how about lock_class being from a static array in lockdep.c:138 ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/