[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150602095237.GL19403@zion.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:52:37 +0100
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@...citrix.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jonathan Davies <Jonathan.Davies@...rix.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"Paul Durrant" <paul.durrant@...rix.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Felipe Franciosi <felipe.franciosi@...rix.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"David Vrabel" <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] "tcp: refine TSO autosizing" causes performance
regression on Xen
Hi Eric
Sorry for coming late to the discussion.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 05:42:16AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 11:01 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>
> > He suggested that after he'd been prodded by 4 more e-mails in which two
> > of us guessed what he was trying to get at. That's what I was
> > complaining about.
>
> My big complain is that I suggested to test to double the sysctl, which
> gave good results.
>
Do I understand correctly that it's acceptable to you to double the size
of the buffer? If so I will send a patch to do that.
Wei.
> Then you provided a patch using a 8x factor. How does that sound ?
>
> Next time I ask a raise, I should try a 8x factor as well, who knows,
> it might be accepted.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists