[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <556D94C1.6060300@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:34:25 +0800
From: "majun (F)" <majun258@...wei.com>
To: catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Li zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, Huxinwei <huxinwei@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4]: Change arm-gic-its to support the Mbigen interrupt
Hi Marc:
Thanks for your review.
Accroding to my initial scheme, mbigen and pci devices uses the
same parent domain--MSI domain.
But accroding to your opinion, it seems use the ITS domain as parent domain
of Mbigne is a better way. Am i right ?
Thanks
Ma Jun
在 2015/6/1 17:13, Marc Zyngier 写道:
> Like I said in patch #1, you need to come up with a different approach.
> Use the LPI layer of the ITS as the parent for your MBI, stop messing
> with the PCI stuff, stop poking the ITS internals.
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists