[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1AD01E7E-4D71-444A-AB0F-F8261C925542@holtmann.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 17:07:25 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
BlueZ development <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Bluetooth: Add reset_resume function
Hi Josh,
>>> Bluetooth devices off of some buses such as USB may lose power across
>>> suspend/resume. When this happens, drivers may need to have the setup
>>> function called again and behave differently than a cold power on.
>>> Add a reset_resume function for drivers to call. During the
>>> reset_resume case, the flag HCI_RESET_RESUME will be set to allow
>>> drivers to differentate.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>
>>> ---
>>> This matches with what hci_reset_dev does and also ensures
>>> the setup function gets called again.
>>> ---
>>> include/net/bluetooth/hci.h | 1 +
>>> include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h | 1 +
>>> net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
>>> index d95da83..6285410 100644
>>> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
>>> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
>>> @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ enum {
>>> HCI_RAW,
>>>
>>> HCI_RESET,
>>> + HCI_RESET_RESUME,
>>> };
>>
>> no more addition to this list of flags please. These are userspace exposed flags and with that ABI that we are never ever touching again. If you need flags on a per device basis, then use the second list.
>
> It would be helpful for other developers if you added a comment to
> that effect above the enum definition. Otherwise you're going to wind
> up repeating yourself over time.
nobody has done that so far ;)
> Also, if they're exposed to userspace, should this file be using the
> uapi mechanism? I'm confused how they're exposed today, given that
> they aren't installed via 'make headers_install'. Is this manually
> synced with some other .h file in a userspace package?
This code is from 2.4.6 and with that pretty much ancient and predates UAPI. The BlueZ userspace library provides userspace versions of these defines etc.
Regards
Marcel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists