linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] i2c: at91: add support to FIFOs and alternative command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150602153622.GB2661@katana>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jun 2015 00:36:28 +0900
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
	nicolas.ferre@...el.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
	mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
	galak@...eaurora.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] i2c: at91: add support to FIFOs and alternative
 command


> If you send a new version, could you add stable in Cc to patch 3/6:

No need to send a new version just because of an additional ack. I can
apply that. However...

> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org #3.10 and later
> If not, Wolfram could you do it please?

The problem with 3/6 is that it seems to depend on 1/6 which is a
cleanup patch. If cleaning up is not essential for the bugfix, the
latter should be done first. To avoid exactly this problem.



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)