[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150602181512.GC14071@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:15:13 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Nariman Poushin <nariman@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] regmap: Add reg_sequence for use with
multi_reg_write / register_patch
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:20:12AM +0100, Nariman Poushin wrote:
> it be accepted), should I:
> - Squash all the updates in to this patch (I suppose the benefit
> there is that we don't break the kernel build from one patch
> to the other)
You need to squash the changes in since they break bisection if handled
separately. It would be better to do this by having a separate patch to
add the newly named structure rather than adding the new functionality
at the same time. That makes the patch more mechanical and easier to
review.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists