[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOxq_8PjG2Hzcdug-G7PJEcP8x02n+ezAw5AiEWpn71RjNt7ww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 12:43:15 -0700
From: Ani Sinha <ani@...sta.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
fruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com>,
Ivan Delalande <colona@...sta.com>
Subject: kernel_thread() for non-GPL drivers
Hi Al :
I see that there has been some code re-org in linux 3.7 starting with
commit 7076aada1040de4ed79a5977dbabdb5e5ea5e249
Author: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon Sep 10 16:44:54 2012 -0400
x86: split ret_from_fork
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
This removed the kernel_thread() x86 specific function that was
exported to all drivers. Then the following commit added a generic
kernel_thread() function which no longer can be used by modules
because the symbol is not exported anymore :
commit 2aa3a7f8660355c3dddead17e224545c1a3d5a5f
Author: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri Sep 21 19:55:31 2012 -0400
preparation for generic kernel_thread()
Let architectures select GENERIC_KERNEL_THREAD and have their copy_thread()
treat NULL regs as "it came from kernel_thread(), sp argument contains
the function new thread will be calling and stack_size - the argument for
that function". Switching the architectures begins shortly...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
All arch specific code now uses this as all of them has
GENERIC_KERNEL_THREAD turned on and then later eventually this #ifdef
was also removed:
commit ae903caae267154de7cf8576b130ff474630596b
Author: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri Dec 14 12:44:11 2012 -0500
Bury the conditionals from kernel_thread/kernel_execve series
All architectures have
CONFIG_GENERIC_KERNEL_THREAD
CONFIG_GENERIC_KERNEL_EXECVE
__ARCH_WANT_SYS_EXECVE
None of them have __ARCH_WANT_KERNEL_EXECVE and there are only two callers
of kernel_execve() (which is a trivial wrapper for do_execve() now) left.
Kill the conditionals and make both callers use do_execve().
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
So my question to you is, which api (for x86) are drivers supposed to
use if kernel_thread() is no longer available? It looks to me like
maybe we can use kthread_run() which eventually lazily creates a
kernel thread. Is my understanding correct?
Cheers,
ani
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists