[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1433286889.438.13.camel@axtens.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 09:14:49 +1000
From: Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>
To: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/9]powerpc/powernv: nest pmu init function with
cpumask attr
On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 21:29 +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> Patch creates a file "nest-pmu-c" to contain nest pmu related functions.
"nest-pmu.c"
> Patch adds nest pmu init function and cpumask function since Nest pmu units
> are per-chip. First online cpu for a given node is picked as
> designated thread to read the counter data.
>
> Subsequent patch adds the hotplug support.
>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Cc: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/perf/nest-pmu.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/perf/nest-pmu.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/nest-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/nest-pmu.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d4413bb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/nest-pmu.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
> +/*
> + * Nest Performance Monitor counter support for POWER8 processors.
> + *
> + * Copyright 2015 Madhavan Srinivasan, IBM Corporation.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> + * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
> + * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> + */
> +
Again, I think this is supposed to be v2 only.
> +#include "nest-pmu.h"
> +
> +static cpumask_t cpu_mask_nest_pmu;
> +
> +static ssize_t cpumask_nest_pmu_get_attr(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &cpu_mask_nest_pmu);
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(cpumask, S_IRUGO, cpumask_nest_pmu_get_attr, NULL);
> +
> +static struct attribute *cpumask_nest_pmu_attrs[] = {
> + &dev_attr_cpumask.attr,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group cpumask_nest_pmu_attr_group = {
> + .attrs = cpumask_nest_pmu_attrs,
> +};
> +
> +void cpumask_chip(void)
> +{
> + const struct cpumask *l_cpumask;
> + int cpu, nid;
> +
> + if (!cpumask_empty(&cpu_mask_nest_pmu)) {
> + printk(KERN_INFO "cpumask not empty\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + cpu_notifier_register_begin();
> + for_each_online_node(nid) {
> + l_cpumask = cpumask_of_node(nid);
> + cpu = cpumask_first(l_cpumask);
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_mask_nest_pmu);
> + }
> +
> + cpu_notifier_register_done();
> +}
It's not clear from the name of this function what it does. I don't
think I actually understand what it does: it appears to register a
notifier on the first cpu of each node; maybe that should be reflected
in the name.
> +static int __init nest_pmu_init(void)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Lets do this only if we are hypervisor
> + */
> + if (!cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type ||
> + strcmp(cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type, "ppc64/power8") ||
> + !cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_HVMODE))
> + return ret;
> +
> + cpumask_chip();
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
- Where is ret set? I can only see it set when it's defined: the if
statment doesn't change the value of ret as far as I can see...
- Would it be clearer if you said
!(strcmp(cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type, "ppc64/power8") == 0)
That would make it clearer that you're trying to get a list of
possible failure conditions.
- Is there really no better way to check if a CPU is a power 8 than an
string comparison?
> +device_initcall(nest_pmu_init);
Regards,
Daniel Axtens
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (861 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists