[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fv6861yb.fsf@belgarion.home>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 21:12:28 +0200
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
computersforpeace@...il.com, zmxu@...vell.com,
boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, jszhang@...vell.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] Documentation: bindings: document the clocks for pxa3xx-nand
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com> writes:
> The pxa3xx nand driver requires at least one clock to probe correctly.
> A second one, named 'ecc' can be specified if needed. Add the
> corresponding documentation.
Is it mandatory, really ?
The code does :
info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(info->clk)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get nand clock\n");
return PTR_ERR(info->clk);
}
info->clk can very well be NULL, can't it ?
Cheers.
--
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists