linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V8 00/10] New cpumask API and Intel Cache Allocation support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Jun 2015 15:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc:	Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vikas.shivappa@...el.com,
	x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
	peterz@...radead.org, matt.fleming@...el.com, will.auld@...el.com,
	kanaka.d.juvva@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 00/10] New cpumask API and Intel Cache Allocation
 support



On Wed, 3 Jun 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Jun 2015, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
>> *All the patches will apply on 4.1-rc4*.
>
> And who is going to resolve the merge conflicts which are caused by
> the updates to the cqm code which are pending in tip/perf ?
>
> You are very well aware of that changes. You got cc'ed on the patches
> and on the tip-bot commit message,

I checked your changes but had not seen the tip-bot messages. I did not expect 
it so soon , I am struggling 
with my mail client past few days. Will resend the patches on the relavant code 
base.

Thanks,
Vikas

so why the hell are you basing your
> patches against a totally different code base?
>
> Thanks,
>
> 	tglx
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/