linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <226151433328161@web20o.yandex.ru>
Date:	Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:42:41 +0300
From:	Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	"umgwanakikbuti@...il.com" <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"ktkhai@...allels.com" <ktkhai@...allels.com>,
	"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"juri.lelli@...il.com" <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
	"pang.xunlei@...aro.org" <pang.xunlei@...aro.org>,
	"oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"luca.abeni@...tn.it" <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed()

[resend]

03.06.2015, 10:32, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 07:27:19PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>>>  + * task_dead_dl() will cancel our timer if we happen to die while
>>>  + * its still pending.
>>  task_dead_dl() is called for tasks of deadline class only. So if we do that,
>>  the timer may be executed after final task's dead.
>
> Indeed; sleep deprived brain misses the obvious :/

I have an idea, but it require small hrtimer modification. We may use
task_struct counters {get,put}_task_struct(), when we're starting or cancelling
the timer, and in timer handler. But it require to return back the commit:

commit 61699e13072a89880aa584dcc64c6da465fb2ccc
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Date:   Tue Apr 14 21:09:23 2015 +0000

    hrtimer: Remove hrtimer_start() return value

because restart of the timer races with time handler.

Also, it's not clearly for me if it's safe to do the final put_task_struct()
from irq context and how it worsens life of RT people.

> I can't seem to come up with anything much better than pulling that
> hrtimer_cancel() into finish_task_switch(), however sad that is.
>
> Something like:
>
>   for_each_class(class) {
>         if (class->task_dead)
>                 class->task_dead(prev);
>   }
>
> Would be nicest, but will slow down the common case. And a callback list
> has the downside of having to preallocate entries for every task,
> causing mostly pointless memory overhead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/