[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXpjHcDhS47B+HQV_kUQVivwgsnFPNyx7kaskXpRjDgnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 17:21:27 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86, tsc: Allow for high latency in quick_pit_calibrate()
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:03:26PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>
>> > > There's the code in tsc_msr.c. It should be relatively
>> > > straightforward to extend it to cover everything that intel_pstate
>> > > supports.
>> >
>> > That's a good idea, but we still need an always working fallback when the
>> > model number is not available. So Adrian's patch is needed in any
>> > case.
>>
>> Nonsense. The slow calibration is already a working fallback.
>
> Please read Adrian's description again. It's not working when the PIT read is
> too slow. That is when the new algorithm is needed.
>
tglx's suggestion was to use slow calibration as a fallback.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists