linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 12/14] perf, tools: Add support for event list topics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150603142520.GA30890@krava>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jun 2015 16:25:20 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	namhyung@...nel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 12/14] perf, tools: Add support for event list topics

On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 05:57:33AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > please split at least the jevents Topic parsing from the rest
> > idelay also the alias update and the display change
> 
> What's the point of all these splits? It's already one logical unit,
> not too large, and is bisectable.

splitting the patch in logical pieces helps review and distro
backporting 

You changed the parsing tool and perf alias code that uses
the new output. IMO it's separate enough to be placed into
separate patches.

I believe the review would have been easier for me if those changes
were separate, also easing my job when backporting this change later
into the distro

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/