| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150603110158.0d21844d@synchrony.poochiereds.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 11:01:58 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] sunrpc: turn swapper_enable/disable functions
into rpc_xprt_ops
On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 10:48:10 -0400
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net> wrote:
> > RDMA xprts don't have a sock_xprt, but an rdma_xprt, so the
> > xs_swapper_enable/disable functions will likely oops when fed an RDMA
> > xprt. Turn these functions into rpc_xprt_ops so that that doesn't
> > occur. For now the RDMA versions are no-ops.
> >
> > Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@...marydata.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> > net/sunrpc/clnt.c | 4 ++--
> > net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> > net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
> > index 26b1624128ec..7eb58610eb94 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
> > @@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ struct rpc_xprt_ops {
> > void (*close)(struct rpc_xprt *xprt);
> > void (*destroy)(struct rpc_xprt *xprt);
> > void (*print_stats)(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct seq_file *seq);
> > + int (*enable_swap)(struct rpc_xprt *xprt);
> > + void (*disable_swap)(struct rpc_xprt *xprt);
> > };
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -327,6 +329,18 @@ static inline __be32 *xprt_skip_transport_header(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, __be32 *
> > return p + xprt->tsh_size;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline int
> > +xprt_enable_swap(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> > +{
> > + return xprt->ops->enable_swap(xprt);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void
> > +xprt_disable_swap(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> > +{
> > + xprt->ops->disable_swap(xprt);
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Transport switch helper functions
> > */
> > @@ -345,8 +359,6 @@ void xprt_release_rqst_cong(struct rpc_task *task);
> > void xprt_disconnect_done(struct rpc_xprt *xprt);
> > void xprt_force_disconnect(struct rpc_xprt *xprt);
> > void xprt_conditional_disconnect(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, unsigned int cookie);
> > -int xs_swapper_enable(struct rpc_xprt *xprt);
> > -void xs_swapper_disable(struct rpc_xprt *xprt);
> >
> > bool xprt_lock_connect(struct rpc_xprt *, struct rpc_task *, void *);
> > void xprt_unlock_connect(struct rpc_xprt *, void *);
> > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> > index 804a75e71e84..60d1835edb26 100644
> > --- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> > +++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> > @@ -2492,7 +2492,7 @@ retry:
> > goto retry;
> > }
> >
> > - ret = xs_swapper_enable(xprt);
> > + ret = xprt_enable_swap(xprt);
> > xprt_put(xprt);
> > }
> > return ret;
> > @@ -2519,7 +2519,7 @@ retry:
> > goto retry;
> > }
> >
> > - xs_swapper_disable(xprt);
> > + xprt_disable_swap(xprt);
> > xprt_put(xprt);
> > }
> > }
> > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c
> > index 54f23b1be986..e7a157754095 100644
> > --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c
> > +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c
> > @@ -682,6 +682,17 @@ static void xprt_rdma_print_stats(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct seq_file *seq)
> > r_xprt->rx_stats.bad_reply_count);
> > }
> >
> > +static int
> > +xprt_rdma_enable_swap(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
>
> Shouldn't the function be returning an error here? What does swapon
> expect if the device you are trying to enable doesn't support swap?
>
Chuck suggested making these no-ops for RDMA for now. I'm fine with
returning an error, but is it really an error? Maybe RDMA doesn't need
any special setup for swapping?
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> > +xprt_rdma_disable_swap(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Plumbing for rpc transport switch and kernel module
> > */
> > @@ -700,7 +711,9 @@ static struct rpc_xprt_ops xprt_rdma_procs = {
> > .send_request = xprt_rdma_send_request,
> > .close = xprt_rdma_close,
> > .destroy = xprt_rdma_destroy,
> > - .print_stats = xprt_rdma_print_stats
> > + .print_stats = xprt_rdma_print_stats,
> > + .enable_swap = xprt_rdma_enable_swap,
> > + .disable_swap = xprt_rdma_disable_swap,
> > };
> >
> > static struct xprt_class xprt_rdma = {
> > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> > index 16aa5dad41b2..b8aaf20aea96 100644
> > --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> > +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> > @@ -1985,14 +1985,14 @@ static void xs_set_memalloc(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > - * xs_swapper_enable - Tag this transport as being used for swap.
> > + * xs_enable_swap - Tag this transport as being used for swap.
> > * @xprt: transport to tag
> > *
> > * Take a reference to this transport on behalf of the rpc_clnt, and
> > * optionally mark it for swapping if it wasn't already.
> > */
> > -int
> > -xs_swapper_enable(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> > +static int
> > +xs_enable_swap(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> > {
> > struct sock_xprt *xs = container_of(xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt);
> >
> > @@ -2007,14 +2007,14 @@ xs_swapper_enable(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > - * xs_swapper_disable - Untag this transport as being used for swap.
> > + * xs_disable_swap - Untag this transport as being used for swap.
> > * @xprt: transport to tag
> > *
> > * Drop a "swapper" reference to this xprt on behalf of the rpc_clnt. If the
> > * swapper refcount goes to 0, untag the socket as a memalloc socket.
> > */
> > -void
> > -xs_swapper_disable(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> > +static void
> > +xs_disable_swap(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> > {
> > struct sock_xprt *xs = container_of(xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt);
> >
> > @@ -2030,6 +2030,17 @@ xs_swapper_disable(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> > static void xs_set_memalloc(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> > {
> > }
> > +
> > +static int
> > +xs_enable_swap(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
>
> Ditto.
>
This just mirrors what the existing code already does. When swap over
NFS is Kconfig'ed off, it returns 0 here. AIUI, swapon will then fail
at the NFS layer though, so you'd never see this.
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> > +xs_disable_swap(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> > +{
> > +}
> > #endif
> >
> > static void xs_udp_finish_connecting(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct socket *sock)
> > @@ -2496,6 +2507,8 @@ static struct rpc_xprt_ops xs_local_ops = {
> > .close = xs_close,
> > .destroy = xs_destroy,
> > .print_stats = xs_local_print_stats,
> > + .enable_swap = xs_enable_swap,
> > + .disable_swap = xs_disable_swap,
> > };
> >
> > static struct rpc_xprt_ops xs_udp_ops = {
> > @@ -2515,6 +2528,8 @@ static struct rpc_xprt_ops xs_udp_ops = {
> > .close = xs_close,
> > .destroy = xs_destroy,
> > .print_stats = xs_udp_print_stats,
> > + .enable_swap = xs_enable_swap,
> > + .disable_swap = xs_disable_swap,
> > };
> >
> > static struct rpc_xprt_ops xs_tcp_ops = {
> > @@ -2531,6 +2546,8 @@ static struct rpc_xprt_ops xs_tcp_ops = {
> > .close = xs_tcp_shutdown,
> > .destroy = xs_destroy,
> > .print_stats = xs_tcp_print_stats,
> > + .enable_swap = xs_enable_swap,
> > + .disable_swap = xs_disable_swap,
> > };
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -2548,6 +2565,8 @@ static struct rpc_xprt_ops bc_tcp_ops = {
> > .close = bc_close,
> > .destroy = bc_destroy,
> > .print_stats = xs_tcp_print_stats,
> > + .enable_swap = xs_enable_swap,
> > + .disable_swap = xs_disable_swap,
> > };
> >
> > static int xs_init_anyaddr(const int family, struct sockaddr *sap)
> > --
> > 2.4.2
> >
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists