[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201506031523.t53FN6pF006352@ignucius.se.axis.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 17:23:06 +0200
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nilsson@...s.com>
To: jespern@...s.com
CC: xili_gchen_5257@...mail.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cris-kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cris: Wire up missing syscalls
> From: Jesper Nilsson <jespern@...s.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 17:04:26 +0200
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:36:47PM +0200, Chen Gang wrote:
> > - For v10, need we also use "sys*" instead of "_sys*"?
>
> No, the trick here is that v10 and v32 uses different standards
> with regards to prefixing underscore. I'm hoping to fix that someday.
Not exactly, but almost; please let me fill in JFTR:
Most people probably guessed correctly that this is related to
building the CRIS v10 kernel with the *-elf toolchain (which has
the convention that symbols are prefixed with underscores for
cris-*-elf and crisv32-*-elf) while (IIUC) the CRIS v32 kernel
is built with the *-linux-gnu toolchain (which does not have any
symbol prefix for cris-*-linux-gnu crisv32-*-linux-gnu).
One Might Imagine that there'd be build machinery in place in
the kernel such that such a symbol prefix issue could be hidden,
like a header to include and using e.g. S(symbol) in all
assembly files. (Actually some time ago I thought there already
was, but Jesper corrected me.)
brgds, H-P
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists