lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1433351804.4861.134.camel@perches.com>
Date:	Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:16:44 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	"Simmons, James A." <simmonsja@...l.gov>
Cc:	James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
	"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	"HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org" <HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
	"lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org" <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH v3 6/7] staging:lustre: style cleanups
 for lib-socket.c

On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 17:12 +0000, Simmons, James A. wrote:
> >On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 10:32 -0400, James Simmons wrote:
> >> Handle all the style issues reported by checkpatch.pl.
> >> Remove general white spaces, spaces in function calls,
> >> etc.
> >[]
> >> @@ -167,13 +164,14 @@ lnet_ipif_enumerate (char ***namesp)
> >>  		if (nalloc * sizeof(*ifr) > PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) {
> >>  			toobig = 1;
> >>  			nalloc = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE/sizeof(*ifr);
> >> -			CWARN("Too many interfaces: only enumerating first %d\n",
> >> -			      nalloc);
> >> +			CWARN("Too many interfaces: only enumerating "
> >> +			      "first %d\n", nalloc);
> >
> >Please don't split single strings into multiple parts.
> >
> >For a patch like this it'd be nice to specify that both
> >"git diff -w" and scripts/objdiff shows no differences.
> >
> >Unless it does...
> 
> Two patches have mistakes. Should I send a new series or do a in-reply instead.

Most of the time, it's better to send a new series.

If any of the unmodified patches are very large, like 100KB+,
then it can be better to send individually updated patches.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ