lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1433351167-125878-17-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Wed,  3 Jun 2015 20:05:47 +0300
From:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCHv6 16/36] mm, thp: remove compound_lock

We are going to use migration entries to stabilize page counts. It means
we don't need compound_lock() for that.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
---
 include/linux/mm.h         | 35 -----------------------------------
 include/linux/page-flags.h | 12 +-----------
 mm/debug.c                 |  3 ---
 mm/memcontrol.c            | 11 +++--------
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index f079d9ffc797..31cd5be081cf 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -403,41 +403,6 @@ static inline int is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(const void *x)
 
 extern void kvfree(const void *addr);
 
-static inline void compound_lock(struct page *page)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
-	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageSlab(page), page);
-	bit_spin_lock(PG_compound_lock, &page->flags);
-#endif
-}
-
-static inline void compound_unlock(struct page *page)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
-	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageSlab(page), page);
-	bit_spin_unlock(PG_compound_lock, &page->flags);
-#endif
-}
-
-static inline unsigned long compound_lock_irqsave(struct page *page)
-{
-	unsigned long uninitialized_var(flags);
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
-	local_irq_save(flags);
-	compound_lock(page);
-#endif
-	return flags;
-}
-
-static inline void compound_unlock_irqrestore(struct page *page,
-					      unsigned long flags)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
-	compound_unlock(page);
-	local_irq_restore(flags);
-#endif
-}
-
 /*
  * The atomic page->_mapcount, starts from -1: so that transitions
  * both from it and to it can be tracked, using atomic_inc_and_test
diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
index 91b7f9b2b774..74b7cece1dfa 100644
--- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
+++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
@@ -106,9 +106,6 @@ enum pageflags {
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
 	PG_hwpoison,		/* hardware poisoned page. Don't touch */
 #endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
-	PG_compound_lock,
-#endif
 	__NR_PAGEFLAGS,
 
 	/* Filesystems */
@@ -683,12 +680,6 @@ static inline void ClearPageSlabPfmemalloc(struct page *page)
 #define __PG_MLOCKED		0
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
-#define __PG_COMPOUND_LOCK		(1 << PG_compound_lock)
-#else
-#define __PG_COMPOUND_LOCK		0
-#endif
-
 /*
  * Flags checked when a page is freed.  Pages being freed should not have
  * these flags set.  It they are, there is a problem.
@@ -698,8 +689,7 @@ static inline void ClearPageSlabPfmemalloc(struct page *page)
 	 1 << PG_private | 1 << PG_private_2 | \
 	 1 << PG_writeback | 1 << PG_reserved | \
 	 1 << PG_slab	 | 1 << PG_swapcache | 1 << PG_active | \
-	 1 << PG_unevictable | __PG_MLOCKED | __PG_HWPOISON | \
-	 __PG_COMPOUND_LOCK)
+	 1 << PG_unevictable | __PG_MLOCKED | __PG_HWPOISON )
 
 /*
  * Flags checked when a page is prepped for return by the page allocator.
diff --git a/mm/debug.c b/mm/debug.c
index 3eb3ac2fcee7..9dfcd77e7354 100644
--- a/mm/debug.c
+++ b/mm/debug.c
@@ -45,9 +45,6 @@ static const struct trace_print_flags pageflag_names[] = {
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
 	{1UL << PG_hwpoison,		"hwpoison"	},
 #endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
-	{1UL << PG_compound_lock,	"compound_lock"	},
-#endif
 };
 
 static void dump_flags(unsigned long flags,
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 1c7c6bb69d3c..d0d862e4ca74 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2761,9 +2761,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup *__mem_cgroup_from_kmem(void *ptr)
 
 /*
  * Because tail pages are not marked as "used", set it. We're under
- * zone->lru_lock, 'splitting on pmd' and compound_lock.
- * charge/uncharge will be never happen and move_account() is done under
- * compound_lock(), so we don't have to take care of races.
+ * zone->lru_lock and migration entries setup in all page mappings.
  */
 void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head)
 {
@@ -4738,9 +4736,7 @@ static struct page *mc_handle_file_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
  * @from: mem_cgroup which the page is moved from.
  * @to:	mem_cgroup which the page is moved to. @from != @to.
  *
- * The caller must confirm following.
- * - page is not on LRU (isolate_page() is useful.)
- * - compound_lock is held when nr_pages > 1
+ * The caller must make sure the page is not on LRU (isolate_page() is useful.)
  *
  * This function doesn't do "charge" to new cgroup and doesn't do "uncharge"
  * from old cgroup.
@@ -5061,8 +5057,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
 	struct page *page;
 
 	/*
-	 * We don't take compound_lock() here but no race with splitting thp
-	 * happens because:
+	 * No race with splitting thp happens because:
 	 *  - if pmd_trans_huge_lock() returns 1, the relevant thp is not
 	 *    under splitting, which means there's no concurrent thp split,
 	 *  - if another thread runs into split_huge_page() just after we
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ