linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64: Image: Allow the appending of a device tree binary

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date:	Thu, 4 Jun 2015 11:04:50 +0100
From:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:	Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Cc:	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	"bones@...retlab.ca" <bones@...retlab.ca>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64: Image: Allow the appending of a device tree
 binary

Hi,

On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 10:35:04AM +0100, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> This patch provides the ability to boot using a device tree that is appended
> to the raw binary Image (e.g. cat Image <filename>.dtb > Image_w_dtb).
> 
> Both BE and LE conditions are tested.
> 
> Got references from e2a6a3aa ("ARM: zImage: Allow the appending of a device tree binary").

NAK for this as it stands. I really don't want to see appended DTB for
arm64.

We needed it for arm because old bootloaders didn't know how to pass a
DTB to the kernel. For arm64 DTB has always been a requirement, so
there's no legacy bootloader to support, and the rationale from arm does
not apply.

Adding appended DTB to arm64 encourages the broken assumption that
kernel and DTB are intimately coupled. It relies on arbitrary
limitations that are difficult and/or impossible to change in future in
a compatible fashion (e.g. the 2M carveout you make for the DT to live
in), and also makes it hard to replace either the kernel or DTB becuase
in the resulting Image there's no clear distinction between the two.
It's simply far too fragile.

Thanks,
Mark.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig              | 11 +++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/head.S        | 12 ++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 7796af4..d402448 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -660,6 +660,17 @@ endmenu
>  
>  menu "Boot options"
>  
> +config ARM64_APPENDED_DTB
> +	bool "Use appended device tree blob to Image"
> +	depends on OF
> +	help
> +	  With this option, the boot code will look for a device tree binary
> +	  (DTB) appended to Image
> +	  (e.g. cat Image <filename>.dtb > Image_w_dtb).
> +
> +	  With this option, the size of Image will be extended to be 2MB aligned.
> +	  The 2MB memory followed by Image is used for FDT blob.
> +
>  config CMDLINE
>  	string "Default kernel command string"
>  	default ""
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> index 19f915e..ac00c8a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> @@ -274,6 +274,18 @@ ENDPROC(preserve_boot_args)
>   * The dtb must be 8-byte aligned and live in the first 512M of memory.
>   */
>  __vet_fdt:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_APPENDED_DTB
> +	ldr	x21, =_edata
> +	add	x21, x21, x28
> +	ldr	w0, [x21]
> +#ifndef __AARCH64EB__
> +	ldr	w1, =0xedfe0dd0		// FDT magic word
> +#else
> +	ldr	w1, =0xd00dfeed
> +#endif
> +	cmp	w0, w1
> +	b.ne	1f			// no FDT found
> +#endif
>  	tst	x21, #0x7
>  	b.ne	1f
>  	cmp	x21, x24
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> index a2c2986..c71bac3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> @@ -54,6 +54,18 @@ PECOFF_FILE_ALIGNMENT = 0x200;
>  #define PECOFF_EDATA_PADDING
>  #endif
>  
> +/*
> + * Set FDT pointer 2MB aligned to ensure
> + * it don't cross a 2-megabyte boundary.
> + */
> +FDT_FILE_ALIGNMENT = (1 << 21);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_APPENDED_DTB
> +#define FDT_EDATA_PADDING	\
> +	.fdt_edata_padding : { BYTE(0); . = ALIGN(FDT_FILE_ALIGNMENT); }
> +#else
> +#define FDT_EDATA_PADDING
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ALIGN_RODATA
>  #define ALIGN_DEBUG_RO			. = ALIGN(1<<SECTION_SHIFT);
>  #define ALIGN_DEBUG_RO_MIN(min)		ALIGN_DEBUG_RO
> @@ -149,8 +161,13 @@ SECTIONS
>  	_sdata = .;
>  	RW_DATA_SECTION(64, PAGE_SIZE, THREAD_SIZE)
>  	PECOFF_EDATA_PADDING
> +	FDT_EDATA_PADDING	/* 2MB aligned */
>  	_edata = .;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_APPENDED_DTB
> +	. += (1 << 21);		/* maximum 2MB for FDT blob */
> +#endif
> +
>  	BSS_SECTION(0, 0, 0)
>  
>  	. = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);
> -- 
> 1.8.0
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives