[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150604113446.GA11957@potion.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 13:34:46 +0200
From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com, bdas@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] KVM: x86: save/load state on SMM switch
2015-06-04 08:14+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 03/06/2015 21:02, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>> + r = kvm_write_guest(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.smbase + 0xfe00, buf, sizeof(buf));
>>
>> The state is saved in SMRAM, but we are accessing it using the non-SMM
>> address space ... how did it pass testing?
>> (Restore is using SMM address space, so I'm guessing that the mapping
>> from QEMU wasn't really utilizing two separate address spaces.)
>
> At this point of the series there are no separate address spaces yet.
> Patch 10 then changes it everywhere:
>
> @@ -6558,7 +6558,7 @@ static void process_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
My bad, people using jackhammers at 7am are getting the better of me.
> Why did I order it this way? Because it is already possible to test
> this code with the default SMBASE of 0x30000, and it is already
> possible to run the full firmware if you hack it not to close SMRAM
> (for this I used q35's high SMRAM). It is not possible to test the
> code partially if you first add the two address spaces, and only
> implement the world switch second.
The ordering makes sense; I wanted to point out the early return,
noticed this as well and missed that it was fixed later, sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists