[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150604121700.GA6283@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 15:17:00 +0300
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Lu, Baolu" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, balbi@...com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] usb: ulpi: ulpi_init should be executed in
subsys_initcall
Hi Baolu,
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 08:50:12AM +0800, Lu, Baolu wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 12:53 AM, David Cohen wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 07:37:02PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:45:37AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> >>>Phy drivers and the ulpi interface providers depend on the
> >>>registration of the ulpi bus. Ulpi registers the bus in
> >>>module_init(). This could cause unnecessary probe delays.
> >>What do you mean by "probe delays"?
> >I believe he meant the bus users' probe delays. i.e. unnecessary
> >-EPROBE_DEFER happening on ulpi_drivers in case they're registered
> >before ulpi bus itself.
> >
> >Is that correct, Baolu?
>
> Yes.
Could you prepare one more version of this patche with the change log
included.
Thanks,
--
heikki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists