lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 4 Jun 2015 18:06:40 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Nariman Poushin <nariman@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] regmap: Add reg_sequence for use with
 multi_reg_write / register_patch

On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 03:21:19PM +0100, Nariman Poushin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 07:15:13PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > You need to squash the changes in since they break bisection if handled
> > separately.  It would be better to do this by having a separate patch to
> > add the newly named structure rather than adding the new functionality
> > at the same time.  That makes the patch more mechanical and easier to
> > review.

> Ok, I have a patch set ready (as you described) but I am having some
> problem deciding on the correct distribution, the squashed patch that
> touches a whole bunch of subsystems ends up with a monstrous
> get_maintainer.pl output, so even going through and checking
> MAINTAINERS I have ended up with a large list (26 individuals and lists).

> Is this ok? I am not sure if it is going to get bounced by mail servers
> as spam or whether it's bad etiquette to do this, but as you say
> we don't want to break the bisection.

Probably post individual patches for people to look at but make it clear
that they need to go in as a single API change patch rather than be
applied in the commit message.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ