[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150604194422.GF676@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 12:44:22 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...tec.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
James Hartley <james.hartley@...tec.com>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>, cernekee@...omium.org,
Govindraj.Raja@...tec.com, Damien.Horsley@...tec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: pistachio: Add a pll_lock() helper for clarity
On 05/26, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> This commit adds a pll_lock() helper making the code more readable.
> Cosmetic change only, no functionality changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...tec.com>
> ---
Applied to clk-next.
> drivers/clk/pistachio/clk-pll.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/pistachio/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/pistachio/clk-pll.c
> index de53756..9ce1be7 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/pistachio/clk-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/pistachio/clk-pll.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,12 @@ static inline void pll_writel(struct pistachio_clk_pll *pll, u32 val, u32 reg)
> writel(val, pll->base + reg);
> }
>
> +static inline void pll_lock(struct pistachio_clk_pll *pll)
> +{
> + while (!(pll_readl(pll, PLL_STATUS) & PLL_STATUS_LOCK))
> + cpu_relax();
The patch is fine, but I wonder if we shouldn't have a timeout
here in case the PLL fails to lock.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists