[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5570B51F.4060908@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 13:29:19 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>
CC: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
lguest@...ts.ozlabs.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Fix SMAP check in PVOPS environments
On 06/04/2015 12:55 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> Yeah, hard cases make bad law.
>
> I'm not too unhappy with this fix; ideally we'd rename save_fl and
> restore_fl to save_eflags_if and restore_eflags_if too.
>
I would be fine with this... but please document what the bloody
semantics of pvops is actually supposed to be.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists