[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1433450911.2658.6.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 13:48:31 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: fbtft: fix out of bound access
On Thu, 2015-06-04 at 19:04 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> str was 16 bytes but was mentioned as 128 in snprintf.
> again msg is 128 bytes but not sufficient to hold the complete debug
> message of register values.
> Now removed the use of str, msg and print the register values from the
> loop.
[]
> v2: removed the use of msg and str.
It's nice to cc the people that give you suggestions when
you send a new version of a patch.
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
[]
> @@ -1067,8 +1067,6 @@ static int fbtft_init_display_dt(struct fbtft_par *par)
> const __be32 *p;
> u32 val;
> int buf[64], i, j;
[]
> par->fbtftops.write_register(par, i,
> buf[0], buf[1], buf[2], buf[3],
It seems there are only 2 callers of (*write_register)()
and the arguments are always an in-order array int[64]
Maybe it'd be nicer to change the prototypes of the
write_register functions to take a const int *
instead of pushing 64 ints on the stack.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists