[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150605084836.364306429@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 10:48:36 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: umgwanakikbuti@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu
Cc: ktkhai@...allels.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
juri.lelli@...il.com, pang.xunlei@...aro.org, oleg@...hat.com,
wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/14] sched: balance callbacks
Mike stumbled over a cute bug where the RT/DL balancing ops caused a bug.
The exact scenario is __sched_setscheduler() changing a (runnable) task from
FIFO to OTHER. In swiched_from_rt(), where we do pull_rt_task() we temporarity
drop rq->lock. This gap allows regular cfs load-balancing to step in and
migrate our task.
However, check_class_changed() will happily continue with switched_to_fair()
which assumes our task is still on the old rq and makes the kernel go boom.
Instead of trying to patch this up and make things complicated; simply disallow
these methods to drop rq->lock and extend the current post_schedule stuff into
a balancing callback list, and use that.
This survives Mike's testcase.
Changes since -v2:
- reworked the hrtimer patch. -- Kirill, tglx
- added lock pinning
Changes since -v1:
- make SMP=n build,
- cured switched_from_dl()'s cancel_dl_timer().
no real tests on the new parts other than booting / building kernels.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists