[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANq1E4Sqj6y1ys3z_XtgJj61r+4QQK_FCJFMPZ4v-2Ao-ddmXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 11:31:32 +0200
From: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Ethan Zhao <ethan.zhao@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ethan.kernel@...il.com, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/simplefb: simplefb was broken on Oracle and HP
system, skip VIDEO_TYPE_EFI
Hi
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk> wrote:
> (Cc'ing David)
>
> On Wed, 27 May, at 04:45:48PM, Ethan Zhao wrote:
>> As descriped in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98721
>> When kernel 4.0.4 was tested on Oracle and HP system with UEFI mode, no output and
>> login on console.
>>
>> Simplefb was broken on these systems when orig_video_isVGA is VIDEO_TYPE_EFI, so
>> skip it.
>>
>> This patch was tested on Oracle Sun server X5-2 series and HP ProLiant DL380 Gen9
>> with kernel 4.0.4
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ethan Zhao <ethan.zhao@...cle.com>
>> Tested-by: Kunlun Lao <kunlun.lao@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/sysfb_simplefb.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sysfb_simplefb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sysfb_simplefb.c
>> index 764a29f..f833502 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sysfb_simplefb.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sysfb_simplefb.c
>> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ __init bool parse_mode(const struct screen_info *si,
>> unsigned int i;
>>
>> type = si->orig_video_isVGA;
>> - if (type != VIDEO_TYPE_VLFB && type != VIDEO_TYPE_EFI)
>> + if (type != VIDEO_TYPE_VLFB)
>> return false;
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(formats); ++i) {
>
> This patch makes sense to me, but I'd really like David to fill us in on
> the rationale for including VIDEO_TYPE_EFI in the simplefb list in first
> place, and whether he's aware of any platforms that require simplefb for
> UEFI.
simplefb works perfectly fine on EFI systems. There is no need to use
vesafb nor efifb anymore. If simplefb does not work on a platform, we
should fix it. Hence, I object to this patch. Can you elaborate what
exactly the problem is? Are you sure you have CONFIG_FB_SIMPLE=y?
If you really want to use efifb instead, please set
CONFIG_X86_SYSFB=n. This config option controls whether you want
firmware framebuffers to be converted to the generic
simple-framebuffer interface, or whether you want to use the old
vesa/efi-framebuffer interfaces.
Thanks
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists