[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1506051406330.7723@nanos>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 14:07:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] time: Do leapsecond adjustment in gettime
fastpaths
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>
> On 06/05/2015 05:04 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 09:29:13AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >> That leaves the question; for who is this exact second edge important?
> >
> > Distributed applications using the UTC time scale.
> >
> > Many control applications are done with a 1 millisecond period.
> > Having the time wrong by a second for 10 or 100 loops is bad news.
Control applications with a 1ms period running on CLOCK_REALTIME are
broken by definition.
> >
>
> Anything starting @ UTC midnight (I think that would be Beijing, China?) ...
> being one second off is not good.
>
> P.
>
> > Thanks,
> > Richard
> >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists