[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1433509230-22238-1-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 15:00:29 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] Rename ia32entry.S to entry_64_compat_32.S
I'm wondering what people think about this naming scheme:
entry_32.S # 32-bit binaries on 32-bit kernels
entry_64.S # 64-bit binaries on 64-bit kernels
entry_64_compat_32.S # 32-bit binaries on 64-bit kernels
Another option would be:
arch/x86/entry/sys_32.S
arch/x86/entry/sys_64.S
arch/x86/entry/sys_64_compat.S
?
Thanks,
Ingo
===
Ingo Molnar (1):
x86/asm/entry/64/compat: Rename ia32entry.S -> entry_64_compat_32.S
arch/x86/entry/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 2 +-
arch/x86/entry/{ia32entry.S => entry_64_compat_32.S} | 0
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename arch/x86/entry/{ia32entry.S => entry_64_compat_32.S} (100%)
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists