linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 079/110] crypto: s390/ghash - Fix incorrect ghash icv buffer handling.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1433512713-22984-80-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date:	Fri,  5 Jun 2015 14:58:02 +0100
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Gerald Schaefer <geraldsc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 079/110] crypto: s390/ghash - Fix incorrect ghash icv buffer handling.

3.16.7-ckt13 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

commit a1cae34e23b1293eccbcc8ee9b39298039c3952a upstream.

Multitheaded tests showed that the icv buffer in the current ghash
implementation is not handled correctly. A move of this working ghash
buffer value to the descriptor context fixed this. Code is tested and
verified with an multithreaded application via af_alg interface.

Signed-off-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <geraldsc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 arch/s390/crypto/ghash_s390.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/ghash_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/ghash_s390.c
index 7940dc90e80b..b258110da952 100644
--- a/arch/s390/crypto/ghash_s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/crypto/ghash_s390.c
@@ -16,11 +16,12 @@
 #define GHASH_DIGEST_SIZE	16
 
 struct ghash_ctx {
-	u8 icv[16];
-	u8 key[16];
+	u8 key[GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE];
 };
 
 struct ghash_desc_ctx {
+	u8 icv[GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE];
+	u8 key[GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE];
 	u8 buffer[GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE];
 	u32 bytes;
 };
@@ -28,8 +29,10 @@ struct ghash_desc_ctx {
 static int ghash_init(struct shash_desc *desc)
 {
 	struct ghash_desc_ctx *dctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc);
+	struct ghash_ctx *ctx = crypto_shash_ctx(desc->tfm);
 
 	memset(dctx, 0, sizeof(*dctx));
+	memcpy(dctx->key, ctx->key, GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -45,7 +48,6 @@ static int ghash_setkey(struct crypto_shash *tfm,
 	}
 
 	memcpy(ctx->key, key, GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE);
-	memset(ctx->icv, 0, GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -54,7 +56,6 @@ static int ghash_update(struct shash_desc *desc,
 			 const u8 *src, unsigned int srclen)
 {
 	struct ghash_desc_ctx *dctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc);
-	struct ghash_ctx *ctx = crypto_shash_ctx(desc->tfm);
 	unsigned int n;
 	u8 *buf = dctx->buffer;
 	int ret;
@@ -70,7 +71,7 @@ static int ghash_update(struct shash_desc *desc,
 		src += n;
 
 		if (!dctx->bytes) {
-			ret = crypt_s390_kimd(KIMD_GHASH, ctx, buf,
+			ret = crypt_s390_kimd(KIMD_GHASH, dctx, buf,
 					      GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE);
 			if (ret != GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE)
 				return -EIO;
@@ -79,7 +80,7 @@ static int ghash_update(struct shash_desc *desc,
 
 	n = srclen & ~(GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE - 1);
 	if (n) {
-		ret = crypt_s390_kimd(KIMD_GHASH, ctx, src, n);
+		ret = crypt_s390_kimd(KIMD_GHASH, dctx, src, n);
 		if (ret != n)
 			return -EIO;
 		src += n;
@@ -94,7 +95,7 @@ static int ghash_update(struct shash_desc *desc,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int ghash_flush(struct ghash_ctx *ctx, struct ghash_desc_ctx *dctx)
+static int ghash_flush(struct ghash_desc_ctx *dctx)
 {
 	u8 *buf = dctx->buffer;
 	int ret;
@@ -104,24 +105,24 @@ static int ghash_flush(struct ghash_ctx *ctx, struct ghash_desc_ctx *dctx)
 
 		memset(pos, 0, dctx->bytes);
 
-		ret = crypt_s390_kimd(KIMD_GHASH, ctx, buf, GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE);
+		ret = crypt_s390_kimd(KIMD_GHASH, dctx, buf, GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE);
 		if (ret != GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE)
 			return -EIO;
+
+		dctx->bytes = 0;
 	}
 
-	dctx->bytes = 0;
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static int ghash_final(struct shash_desc *desc, u8 *dst)
 {
 	struct ghash_desc_ctx *dctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc);
-	struct ghash_ctx *ctx = crypto_shash_ctx(desc->tfm);
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = ghash_flush(ctx, dctx);
+	ret = ghash_flush(dctx);
 	if (!ret)
-		memcpy(dst, ctx->icv, GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE);
+		memcpy(dst, dctx->icv, GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE);
 	return ret;
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/