[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1433516858.2658.44.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 08:07:38 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] power: user: Standardize "Syncing filesystems ..."
message
On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 12:37 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2015-06-04 11:36:48, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Instead of a two individual printks that would generally be
> > emitted on a single line, emit 2 lines to make the start
> > and end of the synchronization more easily timeable.
[]
> > diff --git a/kernel/power/user.c b/kernel/power/user.c
[]
> > @@ -221,9 +221,9 @@ static long snapshot_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
> > if (data->frozen)
> > break;
> >
> > - printk("Syncing filesystems ... ");
> > + printk("Syncing filesystems ...\n");
> > sys_sync();
> > - printk("done.\n");
> > + printk("Syncing filesystems: done\n");
>
> You converted " ..." -> "..." elsewhere, so why not here?
Missed that one.
> Is splitting message to two lines a good idea?
I think the "done" is unnecessary actually.
As there's no newline on the first, printk is
async and can be interleaved by other threads.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists