[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150605171115.GA22534@roeck-us.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 10:11:15 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: Work around ia64 build problem with ESRT driver.
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 01:02:26PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> So, I'm told this problem exists in the world:
> ----------------------------------------------
> Subject: Build error in -next due to 'efi: Add esrt support'
>
> Building ia64:defconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
>
> drivers/firmware/efi/esrt.c:28:31: fatal error: asm/early_ioremap.h: No
> such file or directory
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> I'm not really sure how it's okay that we have things in asm-generic on
> some platforms but not others - is having it the same everywhere not the
> whole point of asm-generic?
>
> That said, ia64 doesn't have early-ioremap.h . So instead, since it's
> difficult to imagine new IA64 machines with UEFI 2.5, just don't build
> this code there.
>
> To me this looks like a workaround - doing something like:
>
> generic-y += early_ioremap.h
>
> in arch/ia64/include/asm/Kbuild would appear to be more correct, but
> ia64 has its own early_memremap() decl in arch/ia64/include/asm/io.h ,
> and it's a macro. So adding the above /and/ requiring that asm/io.h be
> included /after/ asm/early_ioremap.h in all cases would fix it, but
> that's pretty ugly as well. Since I'm not going to spend the rest of my
> life rectifying ia64 headers vs "generic" headers that aren't generic,
> it's much simpler to just not build there.
>
> Note that I've only actually tried to build this patch on x86_64, but
> esrt.o still gets built there, and that would seem to demonstrate that
> the conditional building is working correctly at all the places the code
> built before. I no longer have any ia64 machines handy to test that the
> exclusion actually works there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile | 5 ++++-
> include/linux/efi.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile b/drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile
> index 26eabbc..81c8527 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile
> @@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
> #
> # Makefile for linux kernel
> #
> -obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) += efi.o esrt.o vars.o reboot.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) += efi.o vars.o reboot.o
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_IA64),)
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) += esrt.o
> +endif
Hi Peter,
How about adding a hidden Kconfig option instead ?
config EFI_ESRT
bool
depends on !IA64
default true
Then you could use
obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_ESRT) += esrt.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_VARS) += efivars.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_VARS_PSTORE) += efi-pstore.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_UEFI_CPER) += cper.o
> diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
> index 024c27e..1983d17 100644
> --- a/include/linux/efi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/efi.h
> @@ -879,7 +879,11 @@ static inline efi_status_t efi_query_variable_store(u32 attributes, unsigned lon
> #endif
> extern void __iomem *efi_lookup_mapped_addr(u64 phys_addr);
> extern int efi_config_init(efi_config_table_type_t *arch_tables);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IA64
and use CONFIG_EFI_ESRT here.
Thanks,
Guenter
> +static inline void efi_esrt_init(void) { }
> +#else
> extern void __init efi_esrt_init(void);
> +#endif
> extern int efi_config_parse_tables(void *config_tables, int count, int sz,
> efi_config_table_type_t *arch_tables);
> extern u64 efi_get_iobase (void);
> --
> 2.4.2
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists