[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqK4dm_Kmoys6+qxJrwFpo0K3gatVQxZiNPoWCduQKqj8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 13:05:54 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
Cc: eric.auger@...com,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
b.reynal@...tualopensystems.com, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Linaro Patches <patches@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] VFIO platform reset
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org> wrote:
> In situations where the userspace driver is stopped abnormally and the
> VFIO platform device is released, the assigned HW device currently is
> left running. As a consequence the HW device might continue issuing IRQs
> and performing DMA accesses.
>
> On release, no physical IRQ handler is setup anymore. Also the DMA buffers
> are unmapped leading to IOMMU aborts. So there is no serious consequence.
>
> However when assigning that HW device again to another userspace driver,
> this latter might face some unexpected IRQs and DMA accesses, which are
> the result of the previous assignment.
In general, shouldn't it just be a requirement that the drivers handle
this condition. You have the same problem with firmware/bootloaders
leaving h/w not in reset state or kexec'ing to a new kernel.
Rob
> In virtualization use-case, a VM newly granted with that HW device may be
> impacted by the assignment of that device to a previous VM:
> - IRQs may be injected very early when booting the new guest, even before
> the guest driver has initialized leading to possible driver state
> inconsistency.
> - DMA accesses may hit the newly mapped VM address space at addresses that
> may jeopardize the integrity of the newly installed VM.
>
> Obviously the criticity depends on the assigned HW device.
>
> As opposed to PCI, there is no standard mechanism to reset the platform
> device.
>
> This series proposes to implement device specific reset functions in
> separate vfio reset modules (in-kernel or external). The vfio-platform
> driver holds a whitelist of implemented triplets (compat string, module
> name, function name). When the vfio-platform driver is probed it identifies
> the fellow reset module/function matching the compat string of the
> device, if any, and forces the load of this reset module.
>
> A first reset module is provided: the vfio-platform-calxedaxgmac
> module which implements a basic reset for the Calxeda xgmac.
>
> The series can be found at
> https://git.linaro.org/people/eric.auger/linux.git/shortlog/refs/heads/v4.1-rc6-reset-v2
>
> History:
> v1 -> v2:
> - much simplified compared to v1 although principle of external modules is
> kept: removed mechanism of dynamic registration of reset functions
> - list is replaced by whitelist lookup table
> - name of the reset function also stored in the lookup table
> - autoload of reset modules
>
> RFC -> PATCH v1:
> - solution now based on a lookup list instead of specialized driver
>
>
> Eric Auger (4):
> VFIO: platform: add reset struct and lookup table
> VFIO: platform: add reset callback
> VFIO: platform: populate the reset function on probe
> VFIO: platform: Calxeda xgmac reset module
>
> drivers/vfio/platform/Kconfig | 2 +
> drivers/vfio/platform/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/vfio/platform/reset/Kconfig | 7 ++
> drivers/vfio/platform/reset/Makefile | 5 ++
> .../platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h | 14 ++++
> 7 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/platform/reset/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/platform/reset/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists