[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5571F015.9080109@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 11:53:09 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: perf: Don't use of_node after putting it
On 06/05/2015 07:45 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 09:53:37PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
>> index 702591f6180a..8af7784a8e35 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
>> @@ -1340,12 +1340,13 @@ static int armpmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> if (arch_find_n_match_cpu_physical_id(dn, cpu, NULL))
>> break;
>>
>> - of_node_put(dn);
>> if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
>> pr_warn("Failed to find logical CPU for %s\n",
>> dn->name);
>> + of_node_put(dn);
>> break;
>> }
>> + of_node_put(dn);
>>
>> irqs[i] = cpu;
>> }
> Yeah, I agree this needs changing but given (a) the CPU node isn't going
> to disappear and (b) this patch will conflict horribly with my queue for
> 4.2, do you mind if I sit on this until after the merge window (as a fix
> for 4.2)?
>
>
Sure, no problem.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists