[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55754974.1020207@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 09:51:16 +0200
From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
CC: eric.auger@...com,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
b.reynal@...tualopensystems.com, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Linaro Patches <patches@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] VFIO platform reset
Hi Rob, Scott,
On 06/05/2015 11:14 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 13:05 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
>> wrote:
>>> In situations where the userspace driver is stopped abnormally and
>>> the
>>> VFIO platform device is released, the assigned HW device currently
>>> is
>>> left running. As a consequence the HW device might continue
>>> issuing IRQs
>>> and performing DMA accesses.
>>>
>>> On release, no physical IRQ handler is setup anymore. Also the DMA
>>> buffers
>>> are unmapped leading to IOMMU aborts. So there is no serious
>>> consequence.
>>>
>>> However when assigning that HW device again to another userspace
>>> driver,
>>> this latter might face some unexpected IRQs and DMA accesses,
>>> which are
>>> the result of the previous assignment.
>>
>> In general, shouldn't it just be a requirement that the drivers
>> handle
>> this condition. You have the same problem with firmware/bootloaders
>> leaving h/w not in reset state or kexec'ing to a new kernel.
>
> It's not the same situation. Firmware may leave HW in a non-reset
> state but it must not leave the HW doing DMA; there's nothing the OS
> could do about that as the OS could get corrupted before the driver
> has a chance to run (this is not fun to debug). Leaving interrupts
> potentially asserted would be bad as well, especially if the interrupt
> is shared.
>
> Likewise, with normal kexec drivers are supposed to quiesce the
> hardware first -- and with kdump, the affected DMA buffers are never
> reused.
>
> In order for the driver to handle this, it would need to reset/quiesce
> the device itself before enabling an IOMMU mapping. How would that
> work for virtualization scenarios where the guest does not see any
> IOMMU, and all vfio mappings are handled by QEMU or equivalent?
This is also my understanding. In a KVM virtualization use case, the
guest potentially could be corrupted by previously set DMA accesses
before getting the chance to stop DMA/IRQs.
Thanks for your interest.
Best Regards
Eric
>
> -Scott
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists