[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1506080425350.10651@east.gentwo.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 04:38:13 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: "Liu, XinwuX" <xinwux.liu@...el.com>
cc: "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"penberg@...nel.org" <penberg@...nel.org>,
"mpm@...enic.com" <mpm@...enic.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"He, Bo" <bo.he@...el.com>, "Chen, Lin Z" <lin.z.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub/slab: fix kmemleak didn't work on some case
On Mon, 8 Jun 2015, Liu, XinwuX wrote:
> when kernel uses kmalloc to allocate memory, slub/slab will find
> a suitable kmem_cache. Ususally the cache's object size is often
> greater than requested size. There is unused space which contains
> dirty data. These dirty data might have pointers pointing to a block
dirty? In what sense?
> of leaked memory. Kernel wouldn't consider this memory as leaked when
> scanning kmemleak object.
This has never been considered leaked memory before to my knowledge and
the data is already initialized.
F.e. The zeroing function in linux/mm/slub.c::slab_alloc_node() zeros the
complete object and not only the number of bytes specified in the kmalloc
call. Same thing is true for SLAB.
I am a bit confused as to what issue this patch would address.
Also please send clean patches without special characters. Ensure proper
tabbing etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists