[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1433766990.1495.39.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 14:36:30 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-crypto <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, smueller@...onox.de
Subject: Re: randconfig build error with next-20150529, in
crypto/jitterentropy.c
Adding Stephan to Cc.
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 20:25 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 03:21:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com> wrote:
> > > Building with the attached random configuration file,
> >
> > Hit the very same error against next-20150605.
> >
> > The issue with that file we have no compiler optimization enabled. So,
> > guys, how you would recommend to fix it?
>
> Stephan, can we get rid of the no optimisation requirement?
Would something like
#pragma GCC push_options
#pragma GCC optimize ("-O0")
static __u64 jent_fold_time(struct rand_data *ec, __u64 time,
__u64 *folded, __u64 loop_cnt)
{
...
}
#pragma GCC pop_options
Be an option to allow the file to be compiled with regular optimizations
enabled?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists