lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1433771791-30567-9-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
Date:	Mon,  8 Jun 2015 14:56:14 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 08/25] mm, vmscan: By default have direct reclaim only shrink once per node

Direct reclaim iterates over all zones in the zonelist and shrinking them
but this is in conflict with node-based reclaim. In the default case,
only shrink once per node.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 4d7ddaf4f2f4..50aa650ac206 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2468,14 +2468,6 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, int order)
  * try to reclaim pages from zones which will satisfy the caller's allocation
  * request.
  *
- * We reclaim from a zone even if that zone is over high_wmark_pages(zone).
- * Because:
- * a) The caller may be trying to free *extra* pages to satisfy a higher-order
- *    allocation or
- * b) The target zone may be at high_wmark_pages(zone) but the lower zones
- *    must go *over* high_wmark_pages(zone) to satisfy the `incremental min'
- *    zone defense algorithm.
- *
  * If a zone is deemed to be full of pinned pages then just give it a light
  * scan then give up on it.
  *
@@ -2490,6 +2482,7 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc,
 	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
 	gfp_t orig_mask;
 	bool reclaimable = false;
+	pg_data_t *last_pgdat = NULL;
 
 	/*
 	 * If the number of buffer_heads in the machine exceeds the maximum
@@ -2502,11 +2495,18 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc,
 
 	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
 					classzone_idx, sc->nodemask) {
-		if (!populated_zone(zone)) {
-			reclaim_idx--;
-			classzone_idx--;
+		BUG_ON(!populated_zone(zone));
+
+		/*
+		 * Shrink each node in the zonelist once. If the zonelist is
+		 * ordered by zone (not the default) then a node may be
+		 * shrunk multiple times but in that case the user prefers
+		 * lower zones being preserved
+		 */
+		if (zone->zone_pgdat == last_pgdat)
 			continue;
-		}
+		last_pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
+		reclaim_idx = zone_idx(zone);
 
 		/*
 		 * Take care memory controller reclaiming has small influence
-- 
2.3.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ