[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5575A798.9070404@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 15:32:56 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>
CC: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] arm64: dts: add SRAM, MHU mailbox and SCPI support
on Juno
On 08/06/15 14:51, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 11:40 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> [...]
>> +
>> + scpi {
>> + compatible = "arm,scpi";
>> + mboxes = <&mailbox 1>;
>> + shmem = <&cpu_scp_hpri>;
>> +
>> + clocks {
>> + compatible = "arm,scpi-clocks";
>> +
>> + scpi_dvfs: scpi_clocks@0 {
>> + compatible = "arm,scpi-dvfs-clocks";
>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>> + clock-indices = <0>, <1>, <2>;
>> + clock-output-names = "vbig", "vlittle", "vgpu";
>
> From where do the clock names derive? They look more like names for
> voltage domains rather than clocks. My (admittedly very old) Juno docs,
> have the clocks as ATLCLK, APLCLK and GPUCLK.
>
I agree, I just copied it from SCPI spec which just deals with power
domain names in the context of DVFS. I will update as per Juno doc.
>> + };
>> + scpi_clk: scpi_clocks@3 {
>> + compatible = "arm,scpi-variable-clocks";
>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>> + clock-indices = <3>, <4>;
>> + clock-output-names = "pxlclk0", "pxlclk1";
>
> Can we also have clock index 5, name 'i2s_clk', for used by audio?
> (I don't know what other clocks the SCP currently supports, but audio is
> one being currently used by the out-of-tree code).
>
I will update.
> Also, I believe that both display outputs share the same clock, and so
> pxlclk0 and pxlclk1 can't be controlled independently. But I guess these
> device-tree entries are for the interface to the SCP firmware, not the
> hardware, and if that pretends the clocks are independent...
>
Yes, this is bit tricky, I will let Liviu answer this.
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists