linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch V3 14/15] xen: allow more than 512 GB of RAM for 64 bit pv-domains

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55752386.5010806@suse.com>
Date:	Mon, 08 Jun 2015 07:09:26 +0200
From:	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	konrad.wilk@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch V3 14/15] xen: allow more than 512 GB of RAM
 for 64 bit pv-domains

On 05/27/2015 07:05 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 27/05/15 17:25, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 20/04/15 06:23, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> 64 bit pv-domains under Xen are limited to 512 GB of RAM today. The
>>> main reason has been the 3 level p2m tree, which was replaced by the
>>> virtual mapped linear p2m list. Parallel to the p2m list which is
>>> being used by the kernel itself there is a 3 level mfn tree for usage
>>> by the Xen tools and eventually for crash dump analysis. For this tree
>>> the linear p2m list can serve as a replacement, too. As the kernel
>>> can't know whether the tools are capable of dealing with the p2m list
>>> instead of the mfn tree, the limit of 512 GB can't be dropped in all
>>> cases.
>>>
>>> This patch replaces the hard limit by a kernel parameter which tells
>>> the kernel to obey the 512 GB limit or not. The default is selected by
>>> a configuration parameter which specifies whether the 512 GB limit
>>> should be active per default for domUs (domain save/restore/migration
>>> and crash dump analysis are affected).
>>>
>>> Memory above the domain limit is returned to the hypervisor instead of
>>> being identity mapped, which was wrong anyway.
>>>
>>> The kernel configuration parameter to specify the maximum size of a
>>> domain can be deleted, as it is not relevant any more.
>>
>> Something in this patch breaks the hvc console in my test domU.
>>
>> kernel BUG at /local/davidvr/work/k.org/tip/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c:153
>>
>> Which suggests the hvc driver mapped the wrong console ring frame.
>
> Sorry, it's patch #13 (xen: move p2m list if conflicting with e820 map)
> that seems to be bad.

I think I've found the reason: the console frame isn't being marked as
"reserved" any more. With moving the p2m list I had to change the call
of memblock_reserve() for it. Before that patch this call covered the
p2m list, the start_info page, the xenstore page and the console page.
I added a memblock_reserve() for start_info, but failed to do so for
xenstore and console.

I'll modify the patch and respin.

I have to check why I didn't hit this issue. Maybe my test machine was
too large and the memory in question didn't get reused until my test
was finished.


Thanks for testing,

Juergen

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/