[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jeX+SMhoVh-wwuNozn5-E-4hfhH7H6RpqgsBnHq30Bmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 09:36:46 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@...com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>,
"heiko.carstens@...ibm.com" <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"schwidefsky@...ibm.com" <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] dax: fix mapping lifetime handling, convert to
__pfn_t + kmap_atomic_pfn_t()
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
<Elliott@...com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Linux-nvdimm [mailto:linux-nvdimm-bounces@...ts.01.org] On Behalf
>> Of Dan Williams
>> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 3:19 PM
>> Subject: [PATCH v4 4/9] dax: fix mapping lifetime handling, convert to
>> __pfn_t + kmap_atomic_pfn_t()
> ...
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c
>> b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c
>> index e8657d3bc588..20725006592e 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c
> ...
>> @@ -165,9 +166,13 @@ static int axon_ram_probe(struct platform_device
>> *device)
>> {
>> static int axon_ram_bank_id = -1;
>> struct axon_ram_bank *bank;
>> - struct resource resource;
>> + struct resource *resource;
>> int rc = 0;
>>
>> + resource = devm_kzalloc(&device->dev, sizeof(*resource),
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!resource)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>
> Since resource is now a pointer...
>
> ...
>> @@ -184,13 +189,13 @@ static int axon_ram_probe(struct platform_device
>> *device)
>>
>> bank->device = device;
>>
>> - if (of_address_to_resource(device->dev.of_node, 0, &resource) != 0)
>> {
>> + if (of_address_to_resource(device->dev.of_node, 0, resource) != 0) {
>> dev_err(&device->dev, "Cannot access device tree\n");
>> rc = -EFAULT;
>> goto failed;
>> }
> ...
>
> ... I'd expect to see a devm_kfree call added after the failed label,
> like was done here:
No, because unlike dccsblk the axon_ram driver actually adheres to the
device model, so it will be auto-freed on failed probe. The dcssblk
implementation is not a proper "driver" so we don't get the
devres_release_all() until the device is unregistered. That causes
the "resource" object to stick around longer than necessary unless we
force devm_kfree() it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists