[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49mw0ahw3o.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 14:51:39 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, vgoyal@...hat.com,
avanzini.arianna@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] cfq-iosched: fix oom cfq_queue ref leak in cfq_set_request()
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> writes:
> If the cfq_queue cached in cfq_io_cq is the oom one, cfq_set_request()
> replaces it by invoking cfq_get_queue() again without putting the oom
> queue leaking the reference it was holding. While oom queues are not
> released through reference counting, they're still reference counted
> and this can theoretically lead to the reference count overflowing and
> incorrectly invoke the usual release path on it.
>
> Fix it by making cfq_set_request() put the ref it was holding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
> Cc: Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists