[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1506080923210.2660@hadrien>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 09:24:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
"Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"<HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org>" <HPDD-discuss@...1.01.org>,
"<devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lustre: question about lov_request.c
> You are right, set_pga seems to be a dead member. It was alive a once, but somehow not fully removed now,
> so it's safe to drop the whole if and also the struct member itself.
> set_oabufs could be dropped as well.
Looking further, in the same function I also don't see any other uses of
the tested field in:
if (req->rq_oi.oi_md)
OBD_FREE_LARGE(req->rq_oi.oi_md, req->rq_buflen);
if (set->set_lockh)
lov_llh_put(set->set_lockh);
Can these be dropped as well?
thanks,
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists