[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150609083103.GO3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 10:31:03 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Tony Li <tony.li@....com>, Ken Xue <ken.xue@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] x86, mwaitt: introduce mwaix delay with a
configurable timer
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:13:40AM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> MWAITX can enable a timer and a corresponding timer value specified in SW
> P0 clocks. The SW P0 frequency is the same with TSC. The timer provides an
> upper bound on how long the instruction waits before exiting.
>
> The implementation of delay function in kernel can lerverage the timer of
> MWAITX. This patch provides a new method (delay_mwaitx) to measure delay
> time.
But does this actually default to mwaitx delay on capable hardware? If
you need to boot with that parameter it means nobody is ever going to
use this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists