[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1433844521.1495.49.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 12:08:41 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
"Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
"Li, Tony" <Tony.Li@....com>, "Xue, Ken" <Ken.Xue@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] x86, mwaitt: make delay method configurable
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 18:03 +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> Why do you think that method is bad?
I already told you; if people have to use a kernel parameter to use
this, _NOBODY_ will use it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists