linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Don't assign structure attributes right away

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150609110708.GR2982@x1>
Date:	Tue, 9 Jun 2015 12:07:08 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...inux.com, lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Don't assign structure
 attributes right away

On Tue, 09 Jun 2015, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 08:03:47AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> > Admittedly this is an extreme example, but I do consider:
> 
> > 	init_data = of_get_regulator_init_data(<blah>);
> > 	if (init_data)
> >         	return -ENOMEM;
> 
> > ... neater than:
> 
> > 	config.init_data = of_get_regulator_init_data(<blah>);
> > 	if (!config.init_data)
> >         	return -ENOMEM;
> 
> Oh, I see.  I pretty much see things the other way for things where the
> temporary has no other users.

I don't feel passionate enough about it to contest.

Skip this patch then.  Are you okay to continue the review?

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/