[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1433851493-23685-3-git-send-email-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 21:04:50 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] mm/mempool: allow NULL `pool' pointer in mempool_destroy()
mempool_destroy() does not tolerate a NULL mempool_t pointer
argument and performs a NULL-pointer dereference. This requires
additional attention and effort from developers/reviewers and
forces all mempool_destroy() callers to do a NULL check
if (pool)
mempool_destroy(pool);
Or, otherwise, be invalid mempool_destroy() users.
Tweak mempool_destroy() and NULL-check the pointer there.
Proposed by Andrew Morton.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
LKML-reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/8/583
---
mm/mempool.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/mempool.c b/mm/mempool.c
index 2cc08de..4c533bc 100644
--- a/mm/mempool.c
+++ b/mm/mempool.c
@@ -150,6 +150,9 @@ static void *remove_element(mempool_t *pool)
*/
void mempool_destroy(mempool_t *pool)
{
+ if (unlikely(!pool))
+ return;
+
while (pool->curr_nr) {
void *element = remove_element(pool);
pool->free(element, pool->pool_data);
--
2.4.3.368.g7974889
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists