[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150609030147.GK21465@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 12:01:47 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
avanzini.arianna@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] cfq-iosched: remove @gfp_mask from
cfq_find_alloc_queue()
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:19:30PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Whatever we end up using, may be it is a good idea to use same policy
> for block group allocation too. Right now we use GFP_ATOMIC for blkcg
> allocation.
>
> So this will be equivalent of that when memory is low, we don't provide
> service differentiation.
Yeap, I'll add a patch to convert all optional allocations to
GFP_NOWAIT.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists